The instant matter arose out of Defendant's termination of Plaintiff in January 2008. Plaintiff is also a former employee of Defendant who worked at several of its Detroit metropolitan area restaurants. Plaintiff is resident of Macomb County, Michigan. Defendant has twenty-one such locations in the Detroit metropolitan area. Defendant is principally engaged in the operation of double drive-thru restaurants. FactsÄefendant is a Florida corporation with its headquarters located in Tampa, Florida. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant's motion is GRANTED. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Defendant denies that it discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of race, and argues that Plaintiff: (1) is judicially estopped from bringing his reverse-race discrimination claims (2) has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and (3) has failed to provide evidence to demonstrate either a prima facie case of reverse-race discrimination or raise a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether Defendant's decision to terminate him was pretextual. (Title VII), and the Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, Mich. terminated his employment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Roche filed this reverse-race discrimination action, alleging that Defendant Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |